-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 04/13/2011 07:08 PM, Trevor Freeman wrote:
> Ok then I don’t get the use case.
>
> Can you describe when a user would do such a thing and what are they trying
> to accomplish?
OK I'll try to spell it out...
The point I was trying to make is and was that the same requirements
and UCs that apply to email apply equally well to XMPP. The fact that
XMPP _has_ store-and-forward capabilities doesn't mean it is _exactly_
the same thing as email.
I believe the difficulty of building web-only XMPP clients and the
fact that plasma-like capabilities are probably equally useful for
XMPP as for email is a response to Stephens question "Why not build
a web-applications?".
Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk2mEjUACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneNrACdG2X3BpzxwMIUKaA8E3SyTJ48
SccAn3kI1ThX3MisHpoRkoQC/x16yMi4
=G2Zh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
plasma mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma
