On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:40 PM Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is correct, but how does this fit in with the request for > contributions that Gabriel issued? External contributors presumably need > to sign a CLA with OCamlPro to give them copyright retention over the > source code so that you can dual license it. Has Gabriel signed such a CLA > for https://github.com/OCamlPro/opam-builder/pull/27, and are other > contributors expected to do the same? I don't understand the relationship between AGPL and the need for a CLA. Many free-software or open-source projects make their contributors sign a CLA (even Docker asks PRs to contain a sign-off), this is completely unrelated to using AGPL, BSD, or whatever. By the way, I didn't need to ask Gabriel to sign the CLA because his contribution, although significative by its impact, is not significative by the number of lines. --Fabrice
_______________________________________________ Platform mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform
