On Friday 30 September 2016 at 21:20, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > > (which tend to be quite unfair toward contributors)... > > Most of the CLAs I have seen recently (probably copied from the same original > one) are actually not so unfair, as they don't ask for the ownership of the > code, but just a license to use and relicense the code.
While not granting the same rights to the contributor if you don't have a liberal (in the sense non GPL) license... What you say is a gross misrepresentation of the actual implications of the terms. Please stop thinking we are idiots. We already had this discussion when you tried to introduce a CLA on OPAM, so I won't discuss this further. Daniel _______________________________________________ Platform mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/platform
