On Wednesday, 1 Nov 2000, Sintsov Dmitri wrote: > Nested runs of plex86 doesn't seem very useful to me. Sounds like a useful thing to do for testing. [lots of snippage] > > The problems I see with no virtualizing is it that basically you'll be > > unable to run plex86 more than once. > well, that's not a very major restriction.. Only being able to run only one guest at a time _is_ a major restriction. Chris -- Chris Emerson, obsessed Cambridge juggler E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web page: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cemerson/
- Re: plex86 video proposal Jeffrey B. Siegal
- RE: plex86 video proposal Nelson Rush
- RE: plex86 video proposal Nelson Rush
- Re: plex86 video proposal Psyon
- Re: plex86 video proposal Martin Garton
- Re: plex86 video proposal Psyon
- RE: plex86 video proposal Nelson Rush
- RE: plex86 video proposal Sintsov Dmitri
- RE: plex86 video proposal Nelson Rush
- Re: plex86 video proposal Sintsov Dmitri
- Re: plex86 video proposal Chris Emerson
- Re: plex86 video proposal Sintsov Dmitri
- Re: plex86 video proposal Kevin Lawton
- RE: plex86 video proposal Sintsov Dmitri
- Re: plex86 video proposal Calvin Smith
- RE: plex86 video proposal Colin Davidson
- Re: plex86 video proposal Psyon
- RE: plex86 video proposal Drew Northup
- Re: plex86 video proposal Colin Davidson
- Re: plex86 video proposal Jeffrey B. Siegal
- Re: plex86 video proposal Martin Garton
