[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > vendor, Red Hat, still targets the '386 by default! The decision to > abandon That hasn't been entirely true for some time. Some packages are compiled differently for different CPUs. For most people there is no practical difference anyway; if your CPU is idle 90% of the time, does optimisation really matter? If you're down to the last 10% of performance you should have upgraded to something faster. There can be cost advantages to having better code, but I suggest actual instances are hard to isolate. -- Cheers John Summerfield http://www2.ami.com.au/ for OS/2 & linux information. Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index. Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition.
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler can be bad) John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler can be bad) Robert W. Cunningham
- RE: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler can be bad) Hausheer, Geoffrey
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler can be... Robert W. Cunningham
- Re: [plex86] Architectural ramblings Kevin Lawton
- Re: [plex86] Architectural ramblings Robert W. Cunningham
- RE: [plex86] Architectural ramblings Drew Northup
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler ca... David C
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assemble... David C
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assemble... Robert W. Cunningham
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler ca... John Summerfield
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assemble... Robert W. Cunningham
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assembler ca... Michael Wood
- Re: [plex86] More on C++ (using assemble... Robert W. Cunningham
