-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anssi Hannula wrote:
> For 32-bit OpenGL applications on x86_64. The package also requires
> 32-bit libxorg-x11.
And when is ati-xorg-devel needed? I guess you should not own the
%{_includedir}/GL directory:
installing ati-xorg-devel-8.20.8-2plf.x86_64.rpm from /var/cache/urpmi/rpms
Preparing...
#############################################
Installation failed:
file /usr/include/GL from install of ati-xorg-devel-8.20.8-2plf
conflicts with file from package lib64xorg-x11-devel-6.9.0-1mdk
Also, for ati-xorg, perhaps you want the `ls' to fail silently here:
Preparing...
#############################################
ls: /usr/share/fglrx/./preun_*.sh: No such file or directory
ls: /usr/share/fglrx/./postun_*.sh: No such file or directory
ls: /usr/share/fglrx/./*.list: No such file or directory
> I see it both on cooker-x86_64 and 2006.0-x86_64.
It seemed to be a problem with urpmi. I re-added the source and it works
now.
I would prefer using smart, but it doesn't seem to handle release tags
right.
Thanks for your help.
I haven't had any success with the ATI free drivers. Also, neither (free
or proprietary) recognize the Radeon X550 that I have, but I can force
it to another chip in my xorg.conf.
If XFdrake were smart, it would force the chip. But I have not had
success with XFdrake either in getting a proper config for the
proprietary driver.
- --
Sincerely,
David Walluck
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDs1qNarJDwJ6gwowRAppmAJ9wm8GGIjVdNJgJ3LOV3Dp0Z0nj1ACgjI7e
zawlry2sF3wPG2550TOlhm4=
=4Wus
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
PLF-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
