On mar, 2007-12-04 at 09:24 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > Interesting point came up in a Distrowatch discussion thread - could we > move 'unrar' from PLF to non-free? It's in PLF 'for its unclear > license', but reading the license I can see why it may not be okay for > main/contrib but it certainly should be okay for non-free. > > This would allow people to get at their RAR archives without needing a > 'third party' repository.
I think that anything which is in PLF because non free but redistributable (and only for this, no patent etc...), should move to non-free _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
