Adam Williamson wrote: > Interesting point came up in a Distrowatch discussion thread - could we > move 'unrar' from PLF to non-free? It's in PLF 'for its unclear > license', but reading the license I can see why it may not be okay for > main/contrib but it certainly should be okay for non-free. > > This would allow people to get at their RAR archives without needing a > 'third party' repository.
+1 It seems the license has changed since unrar was added into PLF, explaining the strange "PLF reason". There were previously unclear restrictions on non-free (as in beer) distribution, but those have been removed, and all distribution is now specifically allowed :) -- Anssi Hannula _______________________________________________ PLF-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/plf-discuss
