On Feb 28, 1:03 pm, Alex Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > The planet feed may lose its relevance which is not what we want. > > > It's one thing to suggest > > that people whose feeds are generating errors should fix them, it's > > something far different to advocate censoring the content. > > Most planet feeds (including ours, I believe) have fairly strict > policies about the type of content they aggregate. I am on three planet > feeds at the moment: > > - plone > - python > - mozilla > > If I were to overload Python or Mozilla with Plone posts, I would expect > to be removed. So it's not as much about censorship (which is a bit of a > loaded term)
I understand that (and the loaded term was purely intentional), but to call for removing _all_ non-Plone content is above and beyond. I've learned about far more than Plone from guys like you & Martin Aspeli. The criteria should not be whether a post is _about_ Plone but whether it's _relevant_ to Plone users. _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
