On 29 February 2012 13:09, derek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 28, 1:03 pm, Alex Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The planet feed may lose its relevance which is not what we want. >> >> > It's one thing to suggest >> > that people whose feeds are generating errors should fix them, it's >> > something far different to advocate censoring the content. >> >> Most planet feeds (including ours, I believe) have fairly strict >> policies about the type of content they aggregate. I am on three planet >> feeds at the moment: >> >> - plone >> - python >> - mozilla >> >> If I were to overload Python or Mozilla with Plone posts, I would expect >> to be removed. So it's not as much about censorship (which is a bit of a >> loaded term) > > I understand that (and the loaded term was purely intentional), but to > call for removing _all_ non-Plone content is above and beyond. I've > learned about far more than Plone from guys like you & Martin Aspeli. > The criteria should not be whether a post is _about_ Plone but whether > it's _relevant_ to Plone users.
+1 The volume is nowhere near enough for people to have cause to be offended if they read a few things that are not specifically about Plone. Martin _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
