Martin Aspeli <[email protected]> writes: > On 29 February 2012 13:09, derek > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Feb 28, 1:03 pm, Alex Clark >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The planet feed may lose its relevance which is not what we want. >>> >>> > It's one thing to suggest >>> > that people whose feeds are generating errors should fix them, it's >>> > something far different to advocate censoring the content. >>> >>> Most planet feeds (including ours, I believe) have fairly strict >>> policies about the type of content they aggregate. I am on three planet >>> feeds at the moment: >>> >>> - plone >>> - python >>> - mozilla >>> >>> If I were to overload Python or Mozilla with Plone posts, I would expect >>> to be removed. So it's not as much about censorship (which is a bit of a >>> loaded term) >> >> I understand that (and the loaded term was purely intentional), but to >> call for removing _all_ non-Plone content is above and beyond. I've >> learned about far more than Plone from guys like you & Martin Aspeli. >> The criteria should not be whether a post is _about_ Plone but whether >> it's _relevant_ to Plone users. > > +1 > > The volume is nowhere near enough for people to have cause to be > offended if they read a few things that are not specifically about > Plone.
+1 I love hearing about the non-plone stuff that Plone people are doing. I find the ancillary content on the Planet Plone feed probably just about as valuable to me as a Plone user and developer as the content that is directly related to Plone. Ross _______________________________________________ Product-Developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/plone-product-developers
