On 2008-10-21 06:28+0200 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing a few problems with the new dynamic drivers > under MinGW (MSYS+MinGW to be more precise). > [...] > [ 19%] Built target get-drv-info > [ 19%] Built target ps > [ 20%] Built target ps_CHECK > Scanning dependencies of target wingcc > [ 20%] Building C object drivers/CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj > Linking C shared module ../dll/wingcc.dll > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x2d2):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x325):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x343):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x3ad):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x42a):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]' > CMakeFiles/wingcc.dir/wingcc.obj(.text+0x44b):wingcc.c: undefined > reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
I believe the above messages indicate target ps was already built (i.e., a stale build tree). It is possible it was built correctly the first time you ran this. Therefore, could you try again with an initially empty build tree and disabling all devices other than ps just to see if the general method works for ps alone? Anticipating that your further results will show complete succuss for ps alone, then the next question is what is the linking issue with the wingcc dynamic device driver build? It's quite possible cmake has not set that up properly for the dynamic drivers case since you are the first to test that case for that device driver. For the ps case the dynamic build has been throughly tested on all non-Windows platforms so that's why I think it will work for you, but it is impossible to do such non-windows testing of wingcc. Anyhow, you will probably have a lot better idea what the linking problem for wingcc is once you output the complete build commands. On Linux that can be done with "make VERBOSE=1". If I recall correctly there is a similar method (maybe the same one) that will work for MinGW/MSYS, but if you cannot remember what that is, maybe Werner knows the details? Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.org); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
