I would agree with this strategy from the project's perspective. That
is, if I were in your shoes, it's what I would do.

Cheers
Steve

On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 15:57 -0800, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> The implementation of the three functions has been delayed according
> to what
> Steve said above.  A preliminary patch for (1) has been delivered, but
> I
> prefer not to work on its integration into PLplot until after the
> present
> release when presumably (2) and (3) will be delivered along with
> possible
> additional changes to (1).
> 
> For this release, I suggest we simply go with what we have in svn
> trunk for
> date/time and ignore for now the preliminary implementation of (1)
> that is
> available.  Andrew, assuming you agree with this plan, I have put a
> warning
> into README.release (revision 9001) about our future plans for
> date/time and
> the API changes that should occur because of that. 
-- 
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Professor Steven J Schwartz      Phone: +44-(0)20-7594-7660
Space and Atmospheric Physics    Fax:   +44-(0)20-7594-7772
The Blackett Laboratory          E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Imperial College London          Office: Huxley 6M70 
London SW7 2AZ, U.K.             Web: http://www.sp.ph.ic.ac.uk/~sjs
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to