On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:16:05AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > > I would prefer the following logic instead: > > if(PL_DOUBLE AND NOT DEFINED LIB_TAG) > set(LIB_TAG "d") > endif(PL_DOUBLE AND NOT DEFINED LIB_TAG) > > In other words, if somebody specifies a library name suffix on the command > line including the null string, let us assume they know what they want so > that is exactly what they get. However, if -DLIB_TAG is not specified at > all by the user, then the suffix will be "d" for the usual (default) > PL_DOUBLE case just like it is now. > > Does any developer here mind this proposed change to the build-system logic?
I don't object. Personally I would rather the default, i.e. double, had no tag and we tagged the floating point version. We're stuck with historical precendent though and I'd not recommend that change. Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
