Hi Alan and Andrew
The shapelib files from Ordnance Survey are my doing. You are right Alan that 
they are under licence rather than in the public domain, however, I used them 
specifically because they were available under an open type licence. I did look 
hard and ordnance survey was the best source of files under any kind of open 
licence. I didn't find anything with a LGPL licence, so unless someone wants to 
generate maps of their own then we will almost certainly have to live with 
different licences here. I would have thought that the details I put in the 
folder with the files would suffice for the credit required by the licence. In 
fact this was the licence info provided to me. However I can see you might want 
to add details to the copyright file. I can do this, but don't want to cause a 
clash with Andrew's work.

Phil

-----Original Message-----
From: "Alan W. Irwin" <[email protected]>
Sent: ‎18/‎09/‎2014 17:31
To: "Andrew Ross" <[email protected]>
Cc: "PLplot development list" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] Debian bug 761057

On 2014-09-18 14:13+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:

>
> I've completely reformatted the debian copyright file (using the new
> machine readable format) and done some grepping for rogue files. I've
> attached a copy and I think this identified all the non-LGPL files (
> parts of files) apart from the additional libraries shipped in lib
> (which I also need to deal with and have an outstanding bug report).

I have not looked at the list in general, but I 
notice you missed some files, e.g., src/mt19937ar.[ch] and
cmake/epa_build/ExternalProject.cmake which are clearly licensed under
a non-LGPL license.  Note those files are found by the find command I
suggested,

find . -type f |grep -v .git \
|xargs grep -li copyright| xargs grep -Li "public license"

so I am a bit puzzled why they are missing from your list.  Of
course, the above command does not discriminate between GPL
and LGPL, but I guess you have that covered with a slight variation
of the above command.

Also, your file states that the shapelib files are in the public
domain. However, if you look at data/ss/os_open_conditions.txt, the
conditions at
<http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/docs/os-opendata-licence.pdf>
appear to apply, i.e., those files are licensed under the "Open
Government" license which apparently requires some changes to our
Copyright file to conform to that license.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  Video for Nerds.  Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to