On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 09:31:21AM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote: > On 2014-09-18 14:13+0100 Andrew Ross wrote: > > > > > I've completely reformatted the debian copyright file (using the new > > machine readable format) and done some grepping for rogue files. I've > > attached a copy and I think this identified all the non-LGPL files ( > > parts of files) apart from the additional libraries shipped in lib > > (which I also need to deal with and have an outstanding bug report). > > I have not looked at the list in general, but I > notice you missed some files, e.g., src/mt19937ar.[ch] and > cmake/epa_build/ExternalProject.cmake which are clearly licensed under > a non-LGPL license. Note those files are found by the find command I > suggested, > > find . -type f |grep -v .git \ > |xargs grep -li copyright| xargs grep -Li "public license" > > so I am a bit puzzled why they are missing from your list. Of > course, the above command does not discriminate between GPL > and LGPL, but I guess you have that covered with a slight variation > of the above command.
I was searching in a different way and clearly missed these. I'll double check. mt19937ar.[ch] are distributed under the standard BSD 3 clause license. cmake/epa_build/ExternalProject.cmake is also distributed under the BSD license, as are some of the other cmake derived files. I'll include these too. Incidentally, ExternalProject.cmake does not contain the full license, but has a comment saying that if the file is distributed outside cmake then the full license should be pasted into the file. We don't do this and we probably should, or at least include the BSD license in our Copyright file. Andrew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
