On 2017-01-04 20:08-0500 Pedro Vicente wrote: >>> Yes that is the expected output, although the window titles should be >>> different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2 different curves. >>> An easy change. What do you think? > > I don't have an opinion on the plot itself, but regarding the > test_c_wxwidgets test, it would be a good idea to put a simple > sleep(1) > betwwen each test so we can see that it's doing what it should do
Hi Pedro: That workaround would work for both -dev wxwidgets (or more likely the wxPLViewer application that that device communciates with) and -dev wingcc. But since a common script is used for all interactive device tests, that workaround would put an unnecessary delay into the results for -dev xwin, tk, xcairo, and qtwidget. Therefore in this case I prefer the definitive fix for these -np issues for wxPLViewer and -dev wingcc. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Plplot-devel mailing list Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel
