On 2017-01-04 20:08-0500 Pedro Vicente wrote:

>>> Yes that is the expected output, although the window titles should be 
>>> different. But actually it may be nicer to at least use 2 different curves. 
>>> An easy change. What do you think?
>
> I don't have an opinion on the plot itself, but regarding the 
> test_c_wxwidgets test, it would be a good idea to put a simple
> sleep(1)
> betwwen each test so we can see that it's doing what it should do

Hi Pedro:

That workaround would work for both -dev wxwidgets (or more likely the
wxPLViewer application that that device communciates with) and -dev
wingcc.  But since a common script is used for all interactive device
tests, that workaround would put an unnecessary delay into the results
for -dev xwin, tk, xcairo, and qtwidget. Therefore in this case I
prefer the definitive fix for these -np issues for wxPLViewer and -dev
wingcc.

Alan
__________________________
Alan W. Irwin

Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy,
University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca).

Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state
implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time
Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting
software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project
(unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net);
and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net).
__________________________

Linux-powered Science
__________________________

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Plplot-devel mailing list
Plplot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/plplot-devel

Reply via email to