"Robert O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since that was an item included in the draft (under channel manager and the > main>advanced options), I should ask why you recommend not packaging > software with any sample Plucker-compatible content, for new users who don't > know any URLs, or don't feel like always keeping up to date with them as > they change?
I don't know: it just smacks of centralisation and giving an official stamp of approval to things. I'm with plucker because I can do whatever I want with it, not just what a certain large corporation says that I can. I do recognise the power in having a listings service on the distribution site, though. At the very least, it should not be distributed with the software because it will change more often than the software (I hope), and it should be possible to pull listings files from multiple sources (not just plkr.org). -- MJR Do you need advice about the Internet or particular net services? Why not talk to my employers? See http://www.luminas.co.uk/ for details.
