Andy Rabagliati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I am fond of sitescooper, because perl is less esoteric than > python, and sitescooper can slice and dice better than the plucker > frontend - picking out certain porions of a page, for example, or > converting the URL to the "print format" on the fly.
I feel that I simply have to comment about perl being described as "less esoteric than python". How do you decide that? I've seen some really disgusting perl, but only mildly distasteful python. Both have their flaws, though. > Scoop ... transcode ... view. > My vote would be for "channel" or "scoop". Would we risk confusing the issues if we call them "scoops" instead of "plucks"? -- MJR Do you need advice about the Internet or particular net services? Why not talk to my employers? See http://www.luminas.co.uk/ for details.
