Hello, JDK 1.4 implements pipe: java.nio.channels.Pipe so easy to use. JDK1.3 implements another way, via pipedWriter, etc, but 1.4 is easier.
But... isn't better to do all in Java? That's will be real independant... easy of use, etc... latter we could provide native binaries from bytecodes via something like gjc (that's will speed up, usefull to less powerfull machines) That's would be nice too if we use Java instead of the wxWindow (or at least QT, wxWindow sux and doesn't come with most of distros) --- Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > I've just spent some time compiling the parser into > Java with Jython, > a system which lets you compile Python programs into > Java jar files. > > Found a parser typo, but was able in general to > create some > Plucker-format documents with the Java version. > However, the data > doesn't look quite right, and I think I've found a > bug in the Jython > version of the Python 'struct' module, which is > probably causing it. > I've reported it. > > In addition, the Jython code doesn't support > os.popen(), which is how > we call out to the image converters, so images > aren't converted. But > there's probably some equivalent to PIL in > Java-land, which could be > used instead. Anyone know what that is? > > Bill > _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Empregos O trabalho dos seus sonhos pode estar aqui. Cadastre-se hoje mesmo no Yahoo! Empregos e tenha acesso a milhares de vagas abertas! http://br.empregos.yahoo.com/
