On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:25:17AM +0200, Frantisek Dufka wrote: > yes I used last CVS version. Thanks a lot for the '--with-version=' tip, > it works fine. I have a problem with the compiling of the viewer too. > > For me the output is > > ... > checking for autoconf... /usr/bin/autoconf > checking for m68k-palmos-gcc... /usr/bin/m68k-palmos-gcc > checking "for PalmOS SDK 4.0"... checking for gcc... > /usr/bin/m68k-palmos-gcc > checking for C compiler default output... configure: error: C compiler > cannot create executables > > Now type 'make' to compile Plucker. > ... > > Is it the same problem you are having?
Precisely the same problem. This I think is specific to the version of automake being used. I figure that there must be a variable we can check to see if we're currently in a cygwin environment, and alter that portion of the configure script to act a little more intelligently. > And also are following warnings important and can they be solved in some > way? The warnings below I do not get. I think its becuase I've installed the zlib and jpeglib libraries in cygwin :) Hmm.. zlib.h is used throughout, but I don't know why we're looking for jpeglib.h.. I cannot find any program that actually needs it anywhere. > checking zlib.h usability... no > checking zlib.h presence... yes > configure: WARNING: zlib.h: present but cannot be compiled > configure: WARNING: zlib.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? > configure: WARNING: zlib.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result > checking for zlib.h... yes > checking jpeglib.h usability... no > checking jpeglib.h presence... yes > configure: WARNING: jpeglib.h: present but cannot be compiled > configure: WARNING: jpeglib.h: check for missing prerequisite headers? > configure: WARNING: jpeglib.h: proceeding with the preprocessor's result > checking for jpeglib.h... yes > checking for deflateEnd in -lz... yes > Thanks for the tip with sed again, I thought about reporting it to > cygwin people, but I couldn't find the sed script causing the problem. > Do you want to report it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]? I was using the same version of sed on windows and linux, and received different results. The funny thing is that I would've expected it to be a problem on both. Personally, my vote would be to fix it on our side, simply because the statement itself doesn't really look right, and could be cleaned up. -- Adam McDaniel Array Networks Calgary, AB, Canada
msg03011/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
