Yes, but... You'll notice that we don't really have the notion of BOLD -- we only have a font style. Our font support is already suboptimal, and I don't see the problem with adding more suboptimality.
It seems to me the viewer already needs font-untangling code, and this would be a relatively minor change to it. Bill > Rather than doing it like that, I think it'd be better to seperate the > fonts and the sub/super script. That way atleast if, for example, a > formula is being written in bold, the subscript characters still appear > in bold. > > I think we should define a specific function code. From the viewer's > point of view these aren't TECHNICALLY fonts, it'll be easier for me > to support becuase I wouldn't have to provide an exception rule (to > normal fonts) whenever a sub/sup font appears. Plus when MORE fonts > are added overtop, I'd have to keep that rule valid, and more problems > could spawn. A function code is more robust and easier to support. _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
