> That is one thing that has bugged me quite a bit. Bold fonts should be a
> tag like italics. But that's for another thread :)
<b>, <i>, <u>, and other similar tags have already been deprecated
in HTML, in favor of their respective font-style/etc. CSS equivalents.
Should we begin supporting that notion (not CSS itself, but the notion of
it) in the viewer and parser?
> The only problem with setting sub/super script as a font is that you have
> to 'hard-code' the actual font-face value. For example:
[snip]
Not unless you consider that the _line_ it exists on from ^ to $
should be rendered in that font face, not the character inside the <sub> tag
pair itself.
d.
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
