On 2003.Oct.6, at 03:34 PM, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003, Matsumoto Masakazu wrote:
I feel the "external links form" is somewhat redundant
Well, I think it is a good way to inform the user about the missing link. On my Treo 600 I have also added a "browse online" button to this form, so that I can access the missing link directly...
Then it might better put "webclipping" symbol (rotated \|/) than drawing double underlines.
External links will be indicated in different way (e.g. with double underlines),
The bad thing about this is that you have to handle "external" and "internal" links differently already when you render the document, i.e. you will have to check every link before rendering them to screen... I don't think that is such a good idea.
Actually, it is checked every time when rendering in my current implementation. It makes rendering a little bit slower only when you enable this feature.
A little bit smarter way will be to keep extra bits for each recordId whether
the link is internal, external, or unknown.
Today, the anchor handling is transparent regarding the internal and external links and I would like to keep it that way.
mm... then extra bits should be kept in other place....
Matto
_______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
