That would seem to do the job.  And it would be a nice small optimization,
too.  ARP
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss
Department of Philosophy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057-1133  U.S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online papers and home page: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
   "Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
       - Paul of Worczyn (1424)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: Seamless fragments problem (was: About 8bits mode with GBKOS)


> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
> > BTW, you might want to take a closer look at the seamless fragments
> > code (bug #851); you know more about that code than me...
>
> Alexander, would it work to just put a test around the code that
> release and replace the current handle?
>
>     if ( currentRecordId != recordId ) {
>         FreeRecordHandle( &currentRecord );
>
>         ErrTry {
>             currentRecord   = GetRecordHandle( recordId );
>             currentRecordId = recordId;
>         }
>         ErrCatch( UNUSED_PARAM( err ) ) {
>             SetLinkIndex( recordId );
>             FrmGotoForm( frmExternalLinks );
>
>             PalmSetCoordinateSystem( prevCoordSys );
>
>             return true;
>         } ErrEndCatch
>     }
>
> Or are there some side effects? No time to completely analyze the
> seamless fragments code, so any kind of input would be welcome...
>
> /Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> plucker-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
>

_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev

Reply via email to