That would seem to do the job. And it would be a nice small optimization,
too. ARP
--
Dr. Alexander R. Pruss
Department of Philosophy
Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20057-1133 U.S.A.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
online papers and home page: www.georgetown.edu/faculty/ap85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Philosophiam discimus non ut tantum sciamus, sed ut boni efficiamur."
- Paul of Worczyn (1424)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Nordstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 1:28 PM
Subject: Seamless fragments problem (was: About 8bits mode with GBKOS)
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003, Michael Nordstrom wrote:
> > BTW, you might want to take a closer look at the seamless fragments
> > code (bug #851); you know more about that code than me...
>
> Alexander, would it work to just put a test around the code that
> release and replace the current handle?
>
> if ( currentRecordId != recordId ) {
> FreeRecordHandle( ¤tRecord );
>
> ErrTry {
> currentRecord = GetRecordHandle( recordId );
> currentRecordId = recordId;
> }
> ErrCatch( UNUSED_PARAM( err ) ) {
> SetLinkIndex( recordId );
> FrmGotoForm( frmExternalLinks );
>
> PalmSetCoordinateSystem( prevCoordSys );
>
> return true;
> } ErrEndCatch
> }
>
> Or are there some side effects? No time to completely analyze the
> seamless fragments code, so any kind of input would be welcome...
>
> /Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> plucker-dev mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
>
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev