On Mon, Oct 13, 2003, Alexander R. Pruss wrote: > That would seem to do the job. And it would be a nice small optimization, > too.
OK, I'll add that for now (I also initialized the currentRecordId to make sure we don't end up with no handle at all:) We might want to take a closer look at this later on, though. /Mike _______________________________________________ plucker-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev
