Sure. I'm super-busy, but I'll have a little time today and next Sunday. Seeing the format will help.

I wonder if we should rethink the way words are referenced. Would it be possible to add general indexing to documents? That could make things easier.

--Josh

On 4/16/06, Alexander R Pruss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Josh Menke wrote:
> On 4/15/06, *Alexander R Pruss* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     This problem should be resolved with the current cvs code (as of March,
>     I think).  I'd appreciate help with annotation and highlight. :-)
>
>
> Sure! Where are we at currently? Just what's in the CVS? Do we have an
> official format yet for storing the annotations and highlights?
>
> I thought it'd be nice to use a labeling system to organize them,
> although that might be jumping ahead a bit. By labeling I mean something
> like how you organize your email if you use gmail. Where you can assign
> multiple labels to a given annotation, etc.

A format has been worked out.  Should I email you the buggy (and
partially compiling) code that I have?

Alex
_______________________________________________
plucker-dev mailing list
plucker-dev@rubberchicken.org
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-dev



--
Joshua Menke
NNML Lab
BYU CS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to