On Thu, 2026-03-12 at 16:37 -0400, Stephen Partington via PLUG-discuss
wrote:
> I would like to see that no water DC. to me, that is the way to go at
> this rate of expansion. Most of those DCs are probably using water
> tower evaporation cooling. which is why they consume the water rather
> than recycle it.

I've always wondered about the efficiency of water cooled vs 'normal'
AC units. So, I did a search, and apparently water cooled used to be
more efficient (assuming plenty of water available), but not so much
any more. 

https://www.araner.com/blog/water-cooled-systems-and-air-cooled-systems
has a comparison (they make both systems)

However,
https://www.energyresourcesgroupinc.com/erg-bulletin/air-vs-water-cooled-equipment/
says that water cooled can be 2x (or more) efficient than air-cooled.

And then there's this
https://noraideas.com/air-source-heat-pump-vs-water-source-heat-pump/
which looks like slightly different technology than water tower-based.

So, now I know - it depends ;-)

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list: [email protected]
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

Reply via email to