On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Ian C.Sison wrote:
> How does postgres stack up to concurrent read-writes?
Like Oracle, it has a multi-versioning system so that readers never wait
for writers and writers never wait for readers. Most other products do
pessimistic locking.
Brian
> On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Ronneil Camara wrote:
> > ..
> > > Our company is using it but not for critical data. I've implemented mysql
> > > for our squid-proxy authentication and secured html pages/directories
> > > running on patched RH 5.2. I've got a single database for my Squid access
> > > and secured web pages. It's very easy. Hataw sa bilis sa pag authenticate.
> > ..
> >
> > Just wait till you want to do updates concurrently with those numerous
> > authenticates. :)
> >
> > You'll see performance drop faster than a rock.
> >
> > MySQL is VERY poor at concurrent read/write access because it only
> > supports table-level locking. Oracle is still king here.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +63 (2) 937-2293
> > Mosaic Communications, Inc. +63 (917) 531-5893
> > Any sufficiently perverted technology is indistinguishable from Perl.
> >
> >
> > -
> > Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> > To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.baquiran.com
AIM: bbaquiran
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
