thanks...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: eric pareja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2000 12:28 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [plug] OT: Firewall Policy Rules
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Ronneil Camara wrote:
>
> > can you name some adv/disadv of the two programs
> (telnet-ssl, ssh)...
>
> ssh requires the target machine to have sshd or if not available rshd
> which is non-secure.
> telnet-ssl works more securely if the target runs ssl capable
> telnetd but
> will fallback to using non-secure telnetd.
>
> i know of a lot of ssh clients for windows, but haven't run into
> telnet-ssl clients for windows yet. hmmm...
>
> one thing i love about ssh though is that it provides scp (secure rcp)
> which i don't think telnet-ssl provides at all.
>
> one interesting thing you could do with telnet-ssl that i
> don't think you
> can do with ssh is do a raw telnet to a secure http port and
> do the usual
> stuff you can do when you telnet to an http port.
>
> it might be a matter of interface only. the two are similar
> in terms of
> function.
>
> eric
> --
> Eric Pareja | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network and System Administrator | web :
> http://www.upm.edu.ph/~xenos
> UP Manila Network | Here... have a clue.
> Most people don't need a great deal of love nearly so much as
> they need a
> steady supply.
>
>
> -
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at
http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
