On 7/15/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, these are big plusses. However, the predicament that we are
currently in -- the government currently using non-open source
solutions that _already work_ and open source solutions (locally
grown) that work but not as well as I personally would like -- we need
to be pragmatic about it.
I suggest we look back to the root of incompetency in programming of
our computer-related courses in the country: lack of exposure to open
source computing and development platforms :)


If a local firm can actually get a fair playing field with regards to
getting a contract sourced to them by developing open source solutions
for goverment software requirements and then develop _quality_
software, that would be a good thing. However, right now, not all open
source development firms in our country owned fully by Filipino
nationals are qualified to bid for government software requirement
projects. If that can be somehow addressed, perhaps that will be a
good thing. But right now, I don't know a lot of firms that can
deliver in case the government _will_ require or favor open source
software for all software requirements in government.
I think we have different channels or target of the argument, and I
believe that the proposed bill will enable and encourage local open
source developers to jump the gun and develop for open source
platforms and propose open source solutions to the government.

Yes, but this is like sitting in an Ivory Tower. Sure, it would great
to think of the ideal case, but in the real world "training" is
paramount to "doing" -- meaning, there is no better training than
actually doing it.
The proposed bill in my opinion is an enabler for the government, if
not a check in balance of government spending on computing facilities.


But please, don't get me wrong -- I would want to see the Philippines
be treated as one of the premiere software development source
countries alongside India and the US. However, I don't think it's the
government's job to make that happen: it ultimately has to be done by
us, the entrepreneurs and the youth that will drive the economy and
growth of the nation, and eventually in the future run it. Until then,
I personally will do my share -- but I don't let myself get
disillusioned by the politics that is involved with getting anything
done in _our_ government today and avoid making mistakes (IMO) such as
requiring or unconditionally favoring open source software in the
government.
If the government does something about a problem, we complain, much
worse if it doesn't raise a finger. What gives? Maybe the government
has already known that it needs technocrats to handle tecnical matters
so it created DOST for that purpose. Yes politics is a hindrance to
get proposals moving at a pace we desire it to be, but like the
presence of evil in our midst, we better see it as a fact of life and
live with it rather than rant about it.


Then a bill favoring Free Software license is not the solution: the
solution would be a bill/law that will require that all software
developed for government under a valid contract have as part of the
stipulations the source code be turned over and made available for
reuse and modification by the government, or a third party found to be
suitable to extend the software in the future. This bill should not
have anything to do with open source licenses, but rather the
definition of the stipulations of contracts undertaken by the
Philippine government.
Microsoft has more than 90% of the desktop computers being used in the
government. Can't we have a bill that gives an option for the
government to save? How bad is it for Microsoft to be reduced to at
least 50% as computing platform for the government? How bad is it for
the common Juan dela Cruz? It's in line with the government's agenda
to save that we should have a law/bill in favor of open source
software solutions, in favor of economic well-being of the country.
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph

Reply via email to