On 8/29/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. But really, when it comes to the server, how would Ubuntu look like when put side by side with RHEL, SuSE, and Debian?
Would be a nice study to have I guess.
I've heard a lot of voices agreeing to not using Ubuntu on the server (which somewhat agrees to my stand), but it would be great if someone gave a differing view? Or is it a general concensus that Ubuntu on the server isn't really yet as mature as we'd like?
I think a lot of those saying this is done prematurely. LTS is only 4 months old and just got a point release. Since LTS is supported for 5 years on the server, we will probably see more visible deployments and case studies during this LTS support cycle. So in summary, in my opinion, LTS is Ubuntu's acid-test for aiming to be at the "enterprise-level" . We've yet to know if its really good or not. The best part is that we have front row tickets to experience it ;) Jerome -- Jerome Gotangco Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 0x9E379FC6 _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
