On 8/31/06, jan gestre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does this have to do with what I said about the BSD's kernel
> design and the technical limitations (or inflexibilities) that the BSD
> flavors provide? I couldn't care less if Yahoo, Microsoft, or Apple
> use FreeBSD in *any* of their systems. Heck, I don't even care that
> Google uses their modified Linux kernel in their P-III farms.
>
> What I care about is what system I will be recommending to my clients
> -- and I don't see how I can possibly sell the fact that
> Free/Net/OpenBSD support is not as good as Linux support of hardware,
> and commercially available support.
>
>
your asking for our opinion right? and based from previous threads that i've
read you said you are an open minded guy not a zealot like some people, so
why the attitude? it's just a recommendation, don't follow it if you don't
like it, you still have the final say on what to do. Linux and the BSD's
will still lag behind MS with regards to hardware compatibility no matter
what we do, it's hard to accept but that's a fact!
This thread is getting nowhere and the whole things turning into
flame. I suggest that we put an end to this discussion.
Ubuntu in the server: nobody seems to agree that it's competent to be
a server so why go through all this senselessness? It seems that the
whole thing is nothing but about
I-know-more-about-Linux-and-nothing-else-but-Linux-so-I'm-more-sophisticated-than-you
kind of thing. Pathetic. Let's move on to better things, ok?
_________________________________________________
Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List
[email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph)
Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists
Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
