and again, why they didn't use Ubuntu LTS? because it
didn't exist prior to the bidding and the previous version
of Ubuntu (5.10) have some driver issues with the proposed
hardware, also during that period.
if Fedora is going to be a good precedence in our local
government, will it lead to more RHEL/Clone adaptation
on the server-side or they're going to stick to Fedora? :)
On 10/1/06, Gideon Guillen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/2/06, Richard Camina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm just wondering why fc3? why not use the latest fedora or use
> ubuntu lts? fc3 is quite old
If you read Ricardo Gonzalez's post, it's not FC3 at all. If you can't
find it, here's the link to his post on the Free.net.ph archives:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20061001.083345.ba28f3d6.en.html
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
