On 8/9/07, Mark Anthony C. Delfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looking into the load balancer, i think it will defeat the purpose of having > 3 web servers, as our http/https service will depend on one machine, the > load balancer. if the load balancer gets down. the 3 web servers will be > useless.
Er, why do you need three web servers then? Failover? Your config is a round-robin DNS setup -- requests *should* randomly go to different servers. Your app developers may want to try out session affinity (or "stickiness" in load-balancing parlance) to get around the session timeout issue. -- Ian Dexter R. Marquez http://iandexter.net | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://feeds.feedburner.com/Coredump _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
