All your assumptions are wrong. I do not have a single PLUG mail marked as Spam.
On 10/10/07, Lois Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > i have a little theory why some plug messages are being marked as spam but > it > > hinges on these assumptions: > > > > * gmail adaptive filters are global (like what daniel said above) > > * a significant number of plug subscribers uses gmail and diligently marks > spam > > messages > > * a significant portion of said subscribers mark those mass generated > > invitations about "new X social engineering site" that we just have to > > absolutely and positively try otherwise we will miss the meaning of our > lives. > > * other users around the world mark those invitations as spam. heck i do > it > > even if i know the person who triggered the invitation. > > * gmail associates other fields in those marked spam messages in > recomputing > > the spam probability of received messages. this unfortunately includes the > > sender which originates from a single source. > > > > put everything together and any mail that comes from > "[email protected]" > > can get a high spam score. > > > > isa pang theory: email footers/signatures that resemble spam "taglines"? > maybe. > > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) > Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (#PLUG @ irc.free.net.ph) Read the Guidelines: http://linux.org.ph/lists Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
