I've reviewed the IRR and I guess it is still within their domain. The new law doesn't mention that there is a need for an "electronics permit" in order for a business to establish usage of computers. So I guess this claim can be contested.
The new law, however, places a heavy bias for ECE's in determination for IT requirements. This is already the current trend though, and for a good reason. On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Holden Hao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 3:26 PM, William Emmanuel Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > I remember a case before with one of our customers where a Fire > > Inspector cited this law and required that servers and the like where > > registered with the city government. > > > > I presume that this is particularly important if: > > - equipment is large and power-hungry > > - large number of equipment within the premises > > But isn't this covered by the domain of Electrical Engineers? What > could be the justification for an "Electronics Permit". I can > understand the need for "Building permits" and "Electrical permits" > since, if unregulated, implementations of such can cause the public > some harm like fire. I am not sure though if the same can apply to > regular electronics. > > > Holden > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
