On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Orlando Andico <[email protected]> wrote: > Naku Paolo, don't say that... Joebert will come along on this thread > and denounce us all as conventional-thinking, > content-to-be-salaried-by-big-companies counter-revolutionaries. :-D > > And then he'll make snarky comments about how "galing" you are. > > And I'm only half-kidding.
linux and other great free and open source software are there more because of joebert-thinking like programmers > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Paolo Falcone <[email protected]> wrote: > .. >> Simple enough - if your needs are simple, or esoteric enough that >> Oracle won't fit (e.g. MPP) - go with Postgresql, MySQL or the other >> FOSS databases, as these offer the best bang in the buck for those >> configurations. The moment you need support for stuff like OLAP, OLTP >> or multiple standards compliance, then get Oracle, as it will offer >> the best bang in the buck for those configurations. how does oracle fare with sybase in datawarehousing? i heard sybase is more expensive than mssql or oracle. is it true sir orly? _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
