Oscar Plameras wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Jerome Gotangco <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alec Joseph Rivera <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Kapipikon na ba :-) ? Breakfast muna guys (salamat sa Jollibee, Nel).. >>> and yosi. >>> >>> Pero para ngan astroturfer tong si Mr. Palmeras eh.. Anyway.. >>> >> Hindi naman. There are always 2 sides to every story that we all have to >> consider in a democracy like a public list. This should not be an exercise >> of the tyranny of the majority. >> > > It's called Fascism. > > > Thanks. Anyway, back at the topic...
Another issue with independent "binary" review is how to know if it wasn't rigged? There were plenty of this way back with M$ and (darn, forgot the name). Having the code available and with many eyes to scrutinize it and its results is still better. Imagine 10 groups feeding it with different datasets instead of one from Comelec (which clearly not everyone trusts), and with, let's say 3 out of those 10, able to pin-point where in the code something could gone wrong. Wouldn't that be better? >> Cheers, >> >> Jerome >> >> _________________________________________________ >> Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List >> http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug >> Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph >> >> > _________________________________________________ > Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List > http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > _________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
