Back to square one. :-) You have good points sir. However, let's just wait for the Supreme Court for the proper interpretation of the law on this matter.
If we synergize our ideas: Source Code Review + Testing = ACCEPTABLE SYSTEM On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Oscar Plameras <[email protected]>wrote: > The good thing about testing by Outcome is that, > 1. It's simple and easy to understand > 2. It's not ambiguous > 3. It's measurable > 4. It's efficient > 5. It does not require the testers(developers of testing procedures) > to be programmers. All that's required is that the testers are > conversant with the System(Systems Analyst Professionals, > i.e., Comelec Analyst in this case). > 6. And above, the concept and the substance of this test > is easy to sell from the President of the Philippines, Senators, > Congressmen,Justice of the Supreme Court, etc., on to the > person on the street. > > No one has to have the qualification of a "second-hand car > salesman" to be able to sell this concept. All one needs is > logic and reason. > > -- Michael R. Janapin Systems Administrator PBTS Baguio City, Philippines http://mulingsilang.wordpress.com
_________________________________________________ Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Mailing List http://lists.linux.org.ph/mailman/listinfo/plug Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
