"Michael C. Robinson" <[email protected]> writes:

Your habit of dropping all the context in replies makes it really hard to
intelligently respond to your messages...

[...]

> I'm concerned about using a proxy because I have seen sites break and I have
> fairly slow servers.  It will be a while before I can even consider fixing
> the slow issue.

I ran a Squid proxy on a 486-SX at 33MHz.  Your server is *not* going to
have a problem with it.


> I frankly see OpenDNS as possibly being superior to Dansguardian.  When it
> comes to media though, sites like hulu which show "adult" material are hard
> to filter out.  Some "adult" sites are recognized by OpenDNS and are
> blocked, but hulu is borderline and it gets allowed.  Where there is hulu,
> there are certainly other sites like it that mix "adult" and family friendly
> media with a very low barrier to access "adult" material.  OpenDNS is
> community driven and fairly effective, but one can't expect OpenDNS to block
> sites like hulu.

...but wait!  Dansguardian with the publicly curated blocklist and content
filtering is doing exactly the same thing, only they can filter with a finer
granularity than OpenDNS.

        Daniel
-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman            ✉ [email protected]            ☎ +61 401 155 707
               ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
_______________________________________________
PLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Reply via email to