eric pareja wrote:

>that'd be 4MB physical RAM with prepared swapspace. 2MB would be too
>tight, i don't ever recall running linux (it might be crawling instead of
>running) on that sparse a system. i tend to put my money into RAM whenever
>i can since throwing more RAM at linux helps improve performance
>generally. sorry, no help from this end re mandrake's troubles.

    ok, 4MB and a 386DX processor was the minimum to run linux on console and not much 
goodies, right?



__________________________________
www.edsamail.com

_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to