En Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 11:18:17AM +0800, Orlando Andico escribio:
#_
#_ Look at the S-spec on the chip. Don't know what it is for CC0 but you can
#_ find that on the net.
#_
#_ But right now Duron is a better deal. MUCH faster than a Celeron MHz per
#_ MHz.
--<><><>--
After heeding our hardware expert's (iow Orly's) advice, i searched the
intel website and this is what i have learned:
Celeron cC0 stepping S-specs:
MHz Boxed Set OEM
566 SL4NW SL4PC
600 SL4NX SL4PB
633 SL4NY SL4PA
667 SL4NZ SL4P9
700 SL4P2 SL4P8
733 SL4P3 SL4P7
766 SL4QF SL4P6
800 SL55R/SL4TF SL4TF (this chip is 100MHz fron side bus)
I hope you find this info usefull.
Based on the tests in the hardware central article I read, a celeron 600 cC0
stepping oc'd to 945 (9x105) is just slightly slower than a Duron oc'd to
904 (8x113). Duron still kicks ass, and is cheaper than celeron, but for
those that already have a BX board that can support the 1.7V of the newer
FC-PPGA celeron, puede na rin.
--
Juan Miguel Cacho [EMAIL PROTECTED] ®
Philippines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...the poor count their blessings, the affluent count their calories.
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
