hello,
'm interested, can you support why it's sucky. i been trying to choose the
best open source RDBMs. i've used mySQL, but not for real database
applications, only small ones. haven't stress tested mySQL also. for
postgreSQL, haven't used it.
can you suggest which is a better RDBMS in relation to reliability, speed,
ease of maintenance, wide development support, support for concurrency,
transaction, and flexibility.
thanks for any info.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Orlando Andico
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 11:55 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [plug] logging again :)
>
>
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Andre John Cruz wrote:
> ..
> > however, is this approach scaleable? i haven't seen yet
> > (maybe i should right now) how apache does its log files.
> > i'm thinking if logging to a database instead can be more
> > scaleable than text file logging.
>
> Yup. Try using Postgresql. The C-client API is EAZY. Don't think about
> Mysql!! it has sucky concurrency!!
>
>
> --
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> POTS Phone: +63 (2) 848-2893
> Mosaic Communications, Inc. GSM Mobile: +63 (917) 531-5893
> I'm not suffering from insanity -- I'm enjoying every minute of it!!
>
> _
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at
http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
