On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 02:57:22PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote:
> > no segfaults yet. why not build it from source? maybe be a library
> > problems because 2.95.3, 2.96, 3.0 have different libstdc++ abi's this
> > means that there cannot be binary compatibility among them. this may
> > not be the problem but it could be.
>
> This could be it ... but I was running the gcc-3.0 built kernels and
> things were working until that segfault. Unfortunately the libstdc of
> Debian's unstable is only for 2.95.4. There are developmental libraries
> and the libgcc1 package for 3.0 but I think most packages still depend on
> the older libraries. I'm sure in time these will upgrade, though, so for
> now I'm holding my horses and using 2.95.4. :)
i figured it may have been a library problem. but you were too "atat"
to hold your horses and walk through the problem.
> So now I'm back to loving Debian. ;>
Typical Love-Hate relationship. hehe
--
___ eric pareja ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - "We're all crazy. No one wants to admit it."
\@/ http://gra.ph/~xenos/xenos.pgp | http://plug.linux.org.ph [O(///)O]======+
v "Even the smallest person can change the course of the future." / Clue |
[ Chiba City: A Cyberpunk MUSH | http://chibacity.erisian.net ] +-------+
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
