On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Paolo Falcone wrote: > As you know, IDE is the low-cost, mass produced > alternative. I'm not saying that SCSI is much better > than IDE or whatever. they've got their own pros/cons. > > Reiserfs might be potentially better than ext2fs (due > to being a better journal-based fs and a much faster > fs) but it's still experimental. they'll get over the > problems in due time. As of kernel 2.4.1, Reiserfs was declared to be production quality. Rumors about it's 'experimental state' are sadly false. _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Orlando Andico
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Ian C. Sison
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Gino LV.Ledesma
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? fooler
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Federico Sevilla III
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Federico Sevilla III
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Orlando Andico
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Orlando Andico
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Paolo Falcone
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Ian C. Sison
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Ian C. Sison
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Federico Sevilla III
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Federico Sevilla III
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Federico Sevilla III
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Juan Miguel Cacho
- Re: [plug] Which is better IDE raid setup? Orlando Andico
