As you know, IDE is the low-cost, mass produced
alternative. I'm not saying that SCSI is much better
than IDE or whatever. they've got their own pros/cons.
Reiserfs might be potentially better than ext2fs (due
to being a better journal-based fs and a much faster
fs) but it's still experimental. they'll get over the
problems in due time.
--- Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 at 20:48, fooler wrote:
> > if that the case then reiserfs must be put into
> scsi and not into ide
> > disk because modern scsi has a hardware feature of
> relocating bad
> > blocks into a good one.
>
> Hmm, don't modern IDE disks have this feature, too?
> I was under the
> impression that they did, but I'm not sure about
> this. Hmm ...
>
> --> Jijo
>
> --
> Federico Sevilla III :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Network Administrator :: The Leather Collection,
> Inc.
>
> _
> Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives
> at http://plug.linux.org.ph
> To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send
> "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
_
Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph
To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
