On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 09:42:22PM +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: > On Sat, 24 Nov 2001 at 21:12, Migs Paraz wrote: > > yes. firewall boxes must have no other services. keep it simple. > > I got a small bit of information that I'd like to clarify on the list. > > Will kernel preemption (ie: RML's kernel-preempt patch) significantly and > positively affect the performance of Linux boxes that handle > firewall/NAT/router roles?
Good question. I don't know. Is kernel-preempt a kernel-build time, or runtime (/proc) choice? _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
