On 29 Nov 2001 04:55:48PM +0800, fooler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > you see what i mean sacha? :-> its better first to do the basic which solve > all the possible combinations even though its tedious and ineffecient but
<impish grin> Well, I'm leaning more towards looking for the nice, clean, elegant solution. At least this way, we can easily identify numbers that need to be looked at more closely. > optimize your algorithm.... the most complex part here is the possible > combinations of parenthesis. that is why postfix is not appropriate here and > i hate it! :-> Err, duh, that's _exactly_ why postfix is appropriate here. I have no idea what you're troubling yourself with. <laugh> Prefix, even, if you don't like postfix... ;) -- Sacha Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 BS CS geek =) Ateneo Cervini-Eliazo Networks (ACENT) tel: 63(2) 426-6001 loc 5925 BOFH excuse #179: multicasts on broken packets _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
