> errata: DOS in not just a bootloader (LILO or GRUB is a bootloader). But > it's not the foundation under Win98 either. It's somewhere between the > two. > Yeah, Win98 is not running under DOS and neither is DOS just a bootloader. I agree it's somewhere in between. MS did that to shorten the development cycle of Win95 for sure, reusing the codes they have with DOS compromising the stability of the OS. That's why they remove DOS as part of the boot up in WinNT kernel OS.
Regards/ Jerome _ Philippine Linux Users Group. Web site and archives at http://plug.linux.org.ph To leave: send "unsubscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe to the Linux Newbies' List: send "subscribe" in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
